Category Archives: What’s Going On

Finding Opportunities at The Economist’s Franchise Fair

If you are thinking about investing in a franchise, The Economist’s online Franchise Fair provides a unique opportunity to meet a variety of franchisers and consultants in real time. The Franchise Fair takes place from June 28 to 29, 2011. Admission is completely free, but space is limited so register in advance.

The Franchise Fair will feature over a dozen leading franchises and consultant firms that can offer free tips and advice to attendees, whether multi-franchisees or first-time investors. For a full list of exhibitors, visit the registration site.

Fair attendees can join topical chat sessions, access testimonials and download resources. There will also be informational webinars hosted by franchise experts, where attendees can interact and ask questions, including:

 International Franchising: What to Look For When Purchasing a Franchise
 Why Buy a Franchise?
 Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company: An Opportunity for Entrepreneurs

The state-of-the-art online fair interface is modeled after a traditional tradeshow. Attendees can log in from their home or office computers and browse virtual exhibitor booths at their leisure. The fair will be open for a full 48 hours. There will also be several live sessions during this 48-hour period where exhibitors will be available to chat live.

Franchise Fair Live Sessions:
June 28: 9:00 AM EST to 1:00 PM EST
June 28: 4:00 PM EST to 8:00 PM EST
June 29: 12:00 PM EST to 4:00 PM EST

Register FREE today!

Questions or comments can be e-mailed to CustomerSupport-OnlineFairs@economist.com.

Understanding the Disclosure Document and Learning From History

By Peter Snell

The fact that most franchisors do not provide earnings claims or projections tends to put their sales representatives in a difficult position when franchisees inevitably ask about their potential earnings. The ‘don’t say anything’ approach has been traditionally accepted as the safest and most prudent course of action for franchisors seeking to avoid misrepresentation claims. Recently, however, this trend has started to shift.

More franchisors are now looking to include limited earnings information in their disclosure documents. While almost all still avoid future projections, many now provide historical earnings information for existing franchises. This sales data is a statistical analysis of current locations and therefore not based on any ‘underlying assumptions.’ It only contains factual information and actual sales results.

To help franchisees analyze this information, many franchisors will organize the historical information according to different categories, such as location (e.g. food court, office, shopping mall, neighbourhood street, rural, urban etc.) and the size of the franchise operation (e.g. kiosk, small, medium or large premises).

Read the full article: Understanding the Disclosure Document

Can a Franchisor Tell Me How Much Money I Will Make?

By Peter Snell

As a general statement, franchisors are extremely hesitant to provide detailed earning claims or projections. The concern is that it is extremely difficult to account for all the variables that might impact how profitable any given location might be. There are just too many factors that affect how any individual franchise will perform.  Earnings projections can vary widely depending upon the geographic location, demographics, site accessibility, location size and a whole host of other influences.

In addition, Canadian franchise legislation requires if an earning claim is to be made, it must be supported by a statement specifying the reasonable basis for that projection and its underlying assumptions. The information used to substantiate the projection must also be available for inspection.

As a result, most franchisors have shied away from providing any earnings information to prospective franchisees. Instead, franchisors typically insist their sales staff refrain from any mention of earnings or financial performance.

Read the full article: Understanding the Disclosure Document

Understanding the Disclosure Document: How much money will I make

By Peter Snell

Franchisors universally agree this is one of the first questions a prospective franchisee will ask. This is understandable, given the individual is looking to invest tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of dollars in the franchised business. It’s only natural to want an understanding of how profitable the venture will be. However, while this seems like a simple and straightforward question, the answer is often very complex.

The franchisor’s sales force is in a difficult position. On the one hand, their job is to generate enthusiasm and sell franchises. On the other, they have to be careful not to ‘oversell’ and create unrealistic expectations for the prospective franchisee, as this can create potential legal liability for the franchisor. If a salesperson exaggerates about how wonderful the system is, the prospective franchisee may, to his or her detriment, rely too heavily on this information. When expectations are not met, franchisees are understandably disappointed, often disenchanted with the system and may even regret their decision to buy a franchise. This is certainly not the way any successful franchisor wants to embark on its relationship with new franchisees.

Taking this even further, franchisees who are given inaccurate information may also look to sue the franchisor for misrepresentation or seek to rescind the agreement if they are in one of the four provinces with franchise disclosure legislation.

Read the full article: Understanding the Disclosure Document

Understanding the Franchise Disclosure Document

By Peter Snell

Disclosure documents provided by franchise systems in Canada contain a wealth of information, which allows prospective franchisees an opportunity to gain valuable insight into the franchisor’s operations. It is extremely important you take the time to fully analyze the disclosure document and be ready to ask the franchisor any questions that arise from your review. Also, while the following information serves as a general overview, you must also seek your own legal and accounting advice when reviewing a disclosure document. Only then can you obtain the specific information and advice relevant to your particular circumstances.

This article will look at one of the most controversial aspects of franchise disclosure: earnings claims and projections. In plain English, an earnings claim is the answer to the question ‘How much money will I make?’ Most franchisors are not willing to answer this question—but why?

Read the full article: Understand the Disclosure Document

Required Statements In A Franchise Disclosure Document

By Peter Snell

Under the Ontario Arthur Wishart Act and the P.E.I. Franchises Act, certain statements need to be set out at the front of a disclosure document, intended to further assist your decision-making. (Alberta does not require any such mandatory statements.) The statements required under Ontario disclosure obligations are as follows:

1. A commercial credit report is a report which may include information on the Franchisor’s business background, banking information, credit history and trade references.  Such reports may be obtained from private credit reporting companies and may provide information useful in making an investment decision.

2. Independent legal and financial advice in relation to the Franchise Agreement should be sought prior to entering into the Franchise Agreement.

3. A prospective franchisee is strongly encouraged to contact any current or previous franchisees prior to entering into the Franchise Agreement.

4. The cost of goods and services acquired under the Franchise Agreement may not correspond to the lowest cost of the goods and services available in the marketplace.

As well, the Ontario disclosure document must contain the following statement:

5. Mediation is a voluntary process to resolve disputes with the assistance of an independent third party.  Any party may propose mediation or other dispute resolution process in regard to a dispute under the Franchise Agreement, and the process may be used to resolve the dispute if agreed to by all parties.

The P.E.I. mandatory statements are similar to those of Ontario, with some slight differences. For example, P.E.I. requires a statement that current and previous franchisees and their contact information can be found in the disclosure document. This is not required under Ontario law.

It is highly recommended that you review this list of statements carefully and use them as a guide when evaluating whether or not a franchise is right for you. The initial excitement of wanting to buy a franchise needs to be tempered by a thorough review and understanding of the business before signing an agreement. In essence, franchise disclosure laws are intended to encourage you to ‘look before you leap.’

Read the full article: Understanding The Disclosure Document

Food Service Intellectual Property: Act Strategically

By Jean-Philippe Mikus

It is in the interest of every restaurateur, particularly those operating franchised food-service chains, to clearly identify the components of their commercial success in order to take the necessary measures to maximize their protection. Simple steps, such as registering a trademark, can prove very useful in cases of misappropriation by competitors.

However, when it comes to copyrights, the jury is still out. Registration is a useful step, but its effectiveness will ultimately be determined by the outcome of this dispute and other cases that will follow. As for patents, if producing prepared meals is part of a franchisor’s business plan, this could prove to be an interesting asset. Protecting certain recipes as confidential information is also conceivable, but this obviously requires the provision of restaurant services, or the sale of the pre-packaged product, give little clue as to its content. It would also be necessary to ensure the preservation of the secret through contractual agreements with employees and business partners.

Regardless of how a franchisor handles these issues, it is important that you, the prospective franchisee, stay informed about legal issues like these, which could greatly impact your future business. Talk to your franchisor and be vigilant about monitoring competitors. Then, you and your franchisor can work together to protect the assets so important to both parties.

Read the full article: Dishing It Out:  Does intellectual property have a place in the kitchen?

Franchises A-Z from Canadian Business Franchise Magazine

The Canadian Business Franchise magazine has added a new directory to our website, the Franchises A-Z listings.  Search over 1000 franchise businesses by company name. Click on a franchise you are interested to bring up a wealth of information!

http://www.franchiseinfo.ca/franchise.php

The 1-Minute Franchise Finder

Are you interested in buying a franchise but aren’t sure where to begin? The 1-Minute Franchise Finder, part of www.franchiseinfo.ca, can help you eliminate the long shots and focus on businesses that suit you best. This online tool allows you to customize searches based on your personal needs, such as location, industry segment and price-range. You’ll have access to comprehensive information on more than 1,000 franchise systems in Canada, all of which can be updated by the franchisor as soon as changes occur. There’s no better, faster way to get into business.

The 1-Minute Franchise Finder, part of www.franchiseinfo.ca, can help you eliminate the long shots and focus on businesses that suit you best.

Food Service Intellectual Property: The Issue of Appearance

By Jean-Philippe Mikus

An item’s appearance can be claimed to be a trademark, but this will be successful only if certain potentially significant obstacles have been overcome. A trademark must be a symbol that identifies the origin of a good or service. If a product’s appearance is purely functional, it will not merit any trademark protection, as confirmed by the Supreme Court several years ago in a case involving Lego(TM) blocks.

In this case, Lego sought to have the courts recognize that the external appearance of its traditional plastic building block was a trademark, including the particular arrangement of studs on top. Evidence before the Federal Court of Canada demonstrated this particular arrangement of studs was the optimal configuration to enable the blocks to cling together, yet be easy enough to separate. The court felt such purely functional aspects should only be protected by patents (Lego’s own patents had all expired by 1988).

This line of reasoning can potentially extend to a product’s ornamental or aesthetic features, appearance, scent, taste, shape, etc. In one case, the federal court refused to consider an engraved image of a cornflower on a glass dish as a valid trademark because the illustration was merely ornamental. Can we infer from this that a particular arrangement or colour given to a dish serves only to stimulate the appetite of customers? Perhaps, but this ornamental quality alone cannot exclude a dish from protection. In all cases, the courts must assess whether this aspect also serves to identify the origin of the restaurant services or dish. In other words, will the mere sight (or scent) of the dish mean to consumers they are consuming food from a specific chain or restaurant.

Read the full article: Dishing It Out:  Does intellectual property have a place in the kitchen?

ADVERTISEMENT